FG and UK’s AI Propaganda Confirms They Have Completely Lost the Battle Against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu

Also Read

 

The attention of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), under the supreme leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has been drawn to yet another laughable piece of artificial intelligence–generated propaganda being circulated by agents of the Nigerian Government, their collaborators in the United Kingdom, and certain anti-Igbo media outlets, falsely claiming that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu threatened to “wipe out Obasanjo’s lineage.”

Only a regime drowning in shame would resort to such childish forgeries to deceive a semi-literate audience.

This new fabrication comes just days after another poorly produced video in which the same propagandists attempted to portray Mazi Kanu as having declared himself a god who decides who lives or dies.

When propaganda reaches this desperate level, it signifies only one thing:
👉🏾 The enemies of Biafra have lost the argument, the case, and the moral ground.
The only weapon left to them is an insult to public intelligence.

---

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Respect for Elder Statesmen

For the record, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has always expressed respect and admiration for Nigeria’s elder statesmen, including Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, Alhaji Shehu Shagari, President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, and Professor Yemi Osinbajo.

There has never been a single instance where he made any disparaging remark about them. The attempt to tie him to such an outrageous and imaginary threat is a disgraceful propaganda stunt that collapses under even the slightest scrutiny.

---

Timing and Desperation Behind the Fabrication

The timing of this AI forgery is quite revealing. It appears that the Nigerian Government and its British handlers are nervous that respected figures such as President Obasanjo may soon publicly call for the immediate release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Their solution, as usual, is to release a poorly edited, AI-generated video to pollute public discourse before the truth overwhelms their false narrative.

---

Questions the Nigerian Government Must Answer

IPOB challenges the Federal Government of Nigeria to present before the public:

1. The valid and extant law under which Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is currently being tried.

2. The subsisting legal charge that qualifies as an offence under Nigerian law today.

If they can produce those two things, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will immediately enter his defence.

Instead of addressing this basic constitutional issue, the government has chosen to invest in AI deepfakes and media manipulation — a clear admission of legal and moral bankruptcy.

---

Judicial Implications

This propaganda also suggests that Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, may finally be signaling to those behind this persecution that he cannot continue to lend credibility to their judicial misconduct.

If the state had the law on its side, it would not need to manufacture digital forgeries and cartoons.

---

The Truth About Insecurity in the South East

IPOB reminds the world that the insecurity in the South East began after the extraordinary rendition and unlawful detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

A man held in solitary confinement for years cannot be the source of external violence.
Nigerian security agencies created the chaos and now blame the victim to cover their tracks.

It is criminal logic that convinces no one.

---

Our Position Remains Unchanged

Those spreading these fabrications must understand that IPOB cannot be swayed by propaganda, AI distortion, or media intimidation.

The issues remain clear and non-negotiable:

• Unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu

• An end to the persecution of IPOB

• Respect for the right to self-determination

• A peaceful referendum for the Biafran people

If certain individuals prefer to remain second-class citizens in Nigeria, that is their choice — and they will have only one vote in any referendum. But they must not drag others into servitude with them.

---

Conclusion

Nigeria should stop embarrassing itself with forged AI videos and instead answer a very simple question before the court:
Where is the law?